The 37-year-old appeared via video link for the hearing at Portsmouth Crown Court

Activist Danny Tommo has admitted to criminal damage after slashing a migrant dinghy with a knife in the English Channel.

The 37-year-old, whose real name is Daniel Thomas, changed his plea to the single charge when he appeared via video link from prison at Portsmouth Crown Court on Thursday.

A court previously heard Thomas had taken a boat into the English Channel and observed the migrant occupants of a dinghy being assisted by the RNLI, Border Force and the French Coastguard.

Prosecutor Kevin Lucie told Basingstoke Magistrates’ Court in September that the defendant instructed his boat to be steered towards the empty Rib that was adrift and then armed himself with a knife as rescue crews also approached the dinghy and a Frenchman boarded from a rescue vessel.

After slashing the boat with the knife, Thomas could be heard saying: “This is what needs to happen to everyone in these boats. Right, you’re on English territory, This is England, this is not France anymore.

“Get off the boat, you have time to get off the boat. This is not France. Take them back.”

At the hearing on Thursday, Thomas, whose address was withheld by the court at a previous hearing, reiterated his plea of not guilty to failing to disclose the Pin to his phone to police, under Section 53 of the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000.

The maximum sentence if convicted of criminal damage valued at more than £5,000 is 10 years’ imprisonment, according to the Sentencing Council.

But if the damage is valued lower than £5,000, the maximum sentence could be a fine and three months’ jail time.

At Thomas’s first appearance at Portsmouth Magistrates’ Court, it was heard that the cost of the damage to the vessel was unknown to be above or below £5,000 because the boat had been taken back to France.

Thomas will also be given credit for his guilty plea.

Judge James Newton-Price KC set his sentencing date for November 18.

Thomas remains in custody ahead of the hearing.

The Independent

Sentencing has been postponed until next month for a report.

Podcaster James English is to be considered for a behaviour programme after he was convicted of domestic abuse against his former partner, a court has heard.

The 43-year-old was found guilty of engaging in a course of behaviour which was abusive of the woman between July 2022 and November 2023 in Glasgow and elsewhere.

He was convicted of several allegations on the single charge following a trial at Glasgow Sheriff Court.

These included an incident where he seized her neck and pinned her against a door when she was pregnant, and another where he pressed his thumbs into her eyebrows.

Other incidents included kicking her on the body causing her to fall off a bed and striking her on the face.

He was due to be sentenced at Glasgow Sheriff Court on Wednesday but the court heard that a further report is needed so that he can be considered for the Caledonian Men’s Programme, a behaviour programme for men convicted of domestic abuse.

Tommy Ross KC, representing English, said that a justice social work report previously ordered by the sheriff was available, along with a reference by a former partner of English.

Sheriff David Hall told English: “I’ve had sight of the justice social work report, clearly you have co-operated fully in the preparation of the report.

“There is a request for you to be considered for the Caledonian Men’s Programme. They require a period of assessment and I am minded to allow that.

“I will defer sentence for the Caledonian Men’s Programme report to be prepared.”

He said the court will also continue consideration of the issue of a non-harassment order.

Sheriff Hall deferred sentence until December 11 at Glasgow Sheriff Court.

English remains on bail.

The 43-year-old, from Larkhall, South Lanarkshire, appeared in Glow, the Scottish reality TV series, and went on to launch the podcast Anything Goes, which has more than 800,000 subscribers on YouTube.

A description on the YouTube channel says it is “the home of raw, unfiltered, and powerful conversations” with guests including “true crime figures, ex-gangsters and police officers”.

Evening Standard

A man accused of delivering a fatal punch on a dancefloor has said he is sorry for his actions.

Billy Allison denied murdering Matthew O’Gara at the Ricco and Loren bar in Lichfield on 24 May but admitted manslaughter.

Stafford Crown Court heard the 36-year-old, of Shirley, delivered a “very, very hard” punch to the 44-year-old pub owner with the “stance and skill of an experienced fighter”.

Giving evidence on Tuesday, Allison said he was “just really sorry for what I did that night and really sorry my actions caused the end of someone’s life”.

Allison, who also admitted grievous bodily harm against O’Gara’s friend, Adam Cooper, denied the attack was carried out with intent.

When asked by his barrister Gurdeep Gracha KC if he had intended to cause really serious injury or death to the victims, he replied: “Definitely not.”

O’Gara was rendered unconscious by the punch, which was to his neck, and he died in hospital two days later, the court heard.

Allison said he was “not really sure” what his intentions were when he hit the victim.

“It’s a bit of a grey area, I’m not really sure why I did it at the time,” he said.

Opening the case last month, prosecution counsel Timothy Hannam KC said it was an “unprovoked and senseless” attack.

O’Gara, who ran a country pub called The Plough on the outskirts of Lichfield, had his back to Allison on the dancefloor, the court heard.

The jury was told he was “completely oblivious” before being punched in the side of the neck.

The force “made a sound loud enough to be heard over the bar’s DJ sound system”, and was hard enough to break several bones and split an artery, Hannam said.

The bleeding caused a haemorrhage at the base of O’Gara’s brain which resulted in a cardiac arrest.

The court heard Allison had been working six or seven days a week as a groundworker at the time of the attack.

It was told he would drink a “couple of times a month” or when Aston Villa, the team he supports, played matches.

Allison said he was usually a “happy drinker” and alcohol would make him “chirpy”.

He also said he took cocaine perhaps once a month, when socialising, to “fit in”.

The court heard details of previous offences, which included a caution in 2007 for criminal damage after breaking into the scorer’s hut at a cricket club and an offence of occasioning actual bodily harm following a fight when he was 18.

In 2009, Allison caused racially or religiously aggravated alarm or distress which arose during an arrest for being drunk and disorderly.

He said he had had a “silly argument” and could not remember exactly what he said to police but thought it was “something racial”.

Allison also failed to disperse when directed to do so at an Aston Villa match in Wolverhampton in 2017.

He said he pleaded guilty on each occasion because it was the “right thing to do”.

Allison is expected to continue his evidence on Wednesday morning.

The trial continues.
BBC News

An anti-asylum seeker protester who threw a beer bottle at a police van has been jailed for two years and 11 months.

Keith Silk, 34, armed himself with eggs and the bottle before attending the demonstration in Epping, Essex, with his parents on 17 July 2025.

Up to 500 people gathered outside The Bell Hotel after a migrant living there, Hadush Kebatu, was charged with – and later jailed for – sex offences.

Silk, of Torrington Drive, Loughton, was sentenced at Chelmsford Crown Court, having been found guilty of violent disorder and criminal damage.

He is the 11th person to be sentenced for involvement in the clashes that day, and the 10th to be jailed.

Prosecutors said the protest had begun peacefully but had descended into “large-scale public disorder” at about 17:30 BST.

It followed the arrival of about 50 counter-demonstrators, which led to clashes among the two groups.

Judge Alexander Mills said cocaine addict Silk had headed to the protest with his mother and father, who was wearing a Knights Templar outfit.

He threw a bottle at a police van and may have accidentally struck a fellow protester with one of his eggs, the judge said.

Prosecutor Harriet Palfreman said Silk had threatened officers and had told one: “We’re supporting a rightful cause. You’re protecting these wrong uns, mate.”

He was said to have warned them: “It’s going to get worse, anyway. All the English Defence League are coming down.”

Silk was also filmed trying but failing to pull a sign for The Bell Hotel out of the ground.

A statement from a senior police officer read to the court said: “In my 20 years of policing, I have never witnessed this scale of disorder in Essex – and certainly not in a town like Epping.”

Peter Pride, in mitigation, said Silk had an anxiety disorder and was experiencing “sensory overload” during the protest.

However, the judge told the defendant: “You chose not only to remain in the situation but to put yourself at the heart of the events.”

Members of Silk’s family wept in the public gallery as he was jailed by the judge.

The protesters already imprisoned for violent disorder on 17 July 2025 are:

Lee Gower: Two years and nine months

Charlie Land: Two years and eight months

Shaun Thompson: Two years and seven months

Jonathan Glover: Two years and six months

Stuart Williams: Two years and four months

Philip Curson: Two years and three months

Martin Peagram: Two years and two months

Dean Smith: One year and 10 months

Aaron Elles: One year and eight months

Luke Fleming, of Thaxted Road, Buckhurst Hill, was given a suspended prison term in June of a year and nine months.

All asylum seekers were removed from The Bell Hotel in June.

BBC News

Disgraced actor and comedian, 51, was described as a ruthless and manipulative sexual predator during trial

Russell Brand was sentenced to more than 10 years in prison on Monday after a judge praised his victims’ bravery and accused him of living “unhindered by the rules by which decent people live”.

As the judge, Mr Justice Bennathan, sentenced Brand for raping one woman and sexual assaulting three others, he said he had told the trial “a series of lies”. The disgraced comedian had displayed a “casual, arrogant disregard of any woman’s right to say no”, he said.

“About 20 years ago, Russell Brand, you were becoming famous. You were clever – and in many people’s eyes, funny and charismatic. You had also become a sexual predator,” the judge said.

“Whatever women wear, wherever they go, whatever they drink, they retain the right to say no and demand justice in the criminal courts when sexual predators like you, Mr Brand, act without their consent.”

Brand’s sentencing, the culmination of a four-week trial at Southwark crown court, came after the four women described the impact of his crimes on their lives in victim impact statements. A woman who was raped by Brand said that the attack had had lasting consequences.

“Even now, I feel that I am living with the trauma of what happened,” she said. “It is something I carry with me every day and it often feels never-ending.”

Brand, 51, appeared emotionless as he was jailed, but told his wife, Laura: “We’ll be OK,” as he was taken downstairs by the dock officers. His wife replied: “I love you,” before leaving the court in tears.

The disgraced comedian was convicted on Thursday of raping a 21-year-old fan and sexually assaulting three women in separate incidents between 2004 and 2009. He was cleared of two further charges of rape and one of attempted indecent assault.

After his convictions, the Metropolitan police revealed that Brand was under investigation over two further rape allegations.

On Monday, the judge praised the bravery of the women in the case. He also criticised Brand’s “staggering arrogance” before sentencing him to 10-and-a-half years in prison.

In his sentencing remarks which were broadcast live, Bennathan told Brand: “I pause to pay tribute to the determination and bravery of all the women whose evidence I have been recounting. I do not increase your punishment because of it, but all those women had to face being confronted and being told they had lied, or twisted the truth and, or, they had agreed to your sexual demands: that was all done because of you, on your instructions.”

The Guardian

The sentencing remarks are here

R-v-Russell-Brand-Sentencing-Remarks-9.11.26-1

A suspended Reform UK councillor has been convicted of a malicious communication over a Facebook post about Nigerian people.

Sunderland city councillor Glenn Gibbins has been sentenced to a 12-month community order with 150 hours of unpaid work for the “grossly offensive” post made in March 2024.

It came to light after he was elected to represent the Hylton Castle ward in May 2026.

Convicting him after a trial at South Tyneside Magistrates’ Court, District Judge Zoe Passfield said: “The post was nothing more and nothing less than a grossly offensive comment about members of the Nigerian community in Sunderland and Mr Gibbins’ views as to their status, or otherwise, as human beings.”

His legal team said Gibbins intended to appeal at the crown court later.

Gibbins’ post said: “Carnt believe the amount of nigerians in town… should melt them all down and fill in the pot holes!! [sic]”

Police were informed about the post after Gibbins was successfully voted in during local elections.

Prosecutor Emma Dowling said the comment about melting Nigerians down implied they were “somewhat less than human, stripping people in that group of humanity”.

Godwin Ejeh, a community leader in Sunderland’s Nigerian community, gave evidence to say he led a protest outside the City Hall building when Gibbins should have been sworn in, hoping the councillor would apologise.

However, Gibbins had already been suspended by Reform after the post came to light and he did not attend the ceremony.

Ejeh, who stood as a Liberal Democrat councillor in the May elections, denied trying to make political capital from the situation.

He told the court: “We are talking about humanity here, it’s way beyond politics.”

‘Tongue-in-cheek’

Gibbins, a divorced former salesman who runs a stall in Sunderland city centre which prints novelty gifts, told the court it was a tongue-in-cheek joke.

“It was an unreal scenario,” he said. “No-one took it literally.”

Gibbins recalled on the day he made the post, some Nigerians had approached him about buying some of his printing equipment.

He said he had “banter” with them at his stall and the conversation had been good fun.

That night, after “a couple of cans of beer”, he said he saw a post on Facebook about Nigerians which he tried to share without success, so he typed it out and posted it to his public Facebook profile.

When Dowling asked him what reaction he intended, Gibbins said: “It was tongue-in-cheek, a bit naughty, but I thought it was fun.”

Asked by Dowling what was funny about the post, Gibbins replied: “It’s an unreal scenario, you cannot melt people down, anyone that takes that literally… you cannot do that.”

He said: “I wouldn’t dream of joking about killing people.”

Gibbins said he was not particularly political when he was approached by Reform about becoming a councillor in March 2026, but thought it would be a source of income “to tide me over” when business was quieter in the summer.

He also said he had enjoyed helping residents in the brief period when he was not suspended.

Summarising the prosecution case, Dowling said the post was grossly offensive and dehumanising.

She said it was shared “for no reason whatsoever other than to offend and humiliate people from Nigeria who live in Sunderland”.

Adam King, defending, said the post was “unfunny” and “an unpleasant joke/non-joke”.

He said professional comedians such as Jo Brand had joked about throwing acid on Nigel Farage and Jimmy Carr about gypsies in the Holocaust and they had not been prosecuted.

Even if the district judge found the post was grossly offensive, she had to be sure Gibbins intended it to be and could be taken as such, King said.

‘Not politically motivated’

Passfield said Gibbins, who has no previous convictions, accepted his post was offensive, but not grossly so, and maintained it was a joke.

She said it was targeted at a specific ethnic minority and that they could be “eradicated” and turned into inanimate substances and used to fill potholes.

Passfield said she did not believe the case would have gone to court had he confined his observation to the number of Nigerians living in Sunderland, even if that were a racist-held view.

But he went on to reduce them to the status of Tarmac, she said.

His comments were not politically motivated, she added, as there was no wider context about immigration.

The district judge said she had considered Gibbins’ right to free expression as per Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights, but decided the post was not a genuine expression of political views.

BBC News

Reform UK in Swindon have issued an official statement after one of their former councillors pleaded guilty to a criminal offence.

Councillor Lawrence Davies, 54, who represents the Rodbourne Cheney ward, admitted one criminal charges at Swindon Crown Court on Friday, October 23, after being accused of assault by beating, dangerous driving, and attempting to pervert the course of justice.

Davies, from Moredon, was also previously charged with failing to stop after a road collision, failing to report that collision, and driving without insurance, but these charges were not mentioned during the hearing on October 23.

While in the dock, he admitted to one count of assault by beating on April 13 this year, but added: “I did not beat anyone, I threw a sweater, I did not make contact.”

The clerk and judge then advised him to only speak to confirm his pleas.

He pleaded not guilty to one count of dangerous driving on Kingsdown Road on April 13 and one count of attempting to pervert the course of justice by using fake registration plates on a Peugeot between April 12 and 22.

He is due to stand trial for these charges on July 28 next year.

Davies has been released on unconditional bail until that time.

Councillor Sara Godwin, leader of the Reform UK group in Swindon, has provided an update on his affiliation with the party.

She said: “I can confirm the sequence of events regarding Lawrence Davies’ departure from Reform UK.

“On 26 August 2026 at 11:33am, Lawrence Davies was formally notified of his suspension from Reform UK.

“Approximately an hour later, he went to the press publicly announcing that he had resigned from Reform UK.

“However, at that point, we had received no formal resignation from him.”

“On 27 August 2026 at 3:55pm, following a majority vote of the Reform UK Swindon Council Group, we formally submitted the signed notification of his removal from the group.

“Late that evening, at 9:02pm, as we had still received no formal resignation or direct communication from Lawrence Davies, we considered it appropriate to formally acknowledge and accept his publicly announced resignation rather than leave his membership status unresolved.”

“We therefore emailed him directly confirming that we were treating his public announcement of his resignation from Reform UK (as his resignation).”

Cllr Godwin confirmed that since August 27, Mr Davies has had no affiliation with Reform UK or the Reform UK Swindon Council Group.

She said: “As of 27 August 2026, Lawrence Davies became an Independent councillor on Swindon Borough Council, a position he continues to hold.”

Cllr Godwin said that his public announcement followed his suspension, and his removal from the council group was formally agreed and submitted following a majority vote.

After the hearing on October 23, Davies told the Adver, in relation to his guilty plea to the assault charge: “I’m sorry for my mistake, I have changed and have tried to be more aware of how I act.”

Cllr Davies disputed the fact that he had been suspended from Reform at the time, alleging that he was not aware he had been suspended from the party until after he had resigned.

Swindon Advertiser

He told Hull Crown Court: ‘You are definitely not going to see me again’


A rioter who has a “fascination with fires” has become one of the first of the jailed troublemakers to end up back in court – after he put the lives of others at risk through starting a blaze near a gas pipe.

Jordan Murray had been released from prison after being jailed for two years in August 2024 following the notorious scenes of rioting in Hull city centre that month.

But he was soon back in trouble and behind bars on remand for four new offences, including two of arson, Hull Crown Court heard. Murray, 28, of Grasby Road, off Holderness Road, east Hull, but recently in custody on remand, admitted arson being reckless as to whether life was endangered, arson, causing criminal damage and possessing cannabis.

Andrew Petterson, prosecuting, said that Murray set fire to three wheelie bins outside a woman’s home in Staines Close, east Hull, before 5am between March 29 and 30. The bins melted – and they were near a gas pipe.

Murray was seen on CCTV pictures. The woman later said that she had been left “scared and afraid to sleep” and that, because the bin fires were near a gas pipe, it was possible that she, her husband, two children and her grandmother could have died if there had been an explosion.

On April 12, Murray smashed the rear window of a Renault Clio car, belonging to a 90-year-old man, in Staines Close between 12.30 and 1am. He walked away but returned and set the vehicle on fire.

The car, valued at £5,000, was written off. The elderly man had bought it several years earlier and he used it to do his shopping but he could no longer do this and someone had to help him.

The same evening, Murray smashed a window of a Peugeot car parked in Staines Close. He was arrested at his home on April 16. Police found a small amount of cannabis and a “distinctive coat” that linked him on CCTV pictures to the offences.

There were videos on his mobile phone of other earlier fires. “They demonstrate that the defendant certainly had an interest in fires,” said Mr Petterson.

Hannah Turner, mitigating, said that Murray had been released from prison on licence after serving the two-year sentence for his role in the rioting. He had been back in custody again on remand since April.

Murray agreed in court that he had a “fascination with fires” but he said that he had, while in custody, received help for his alcohol and drug issues. He assured the court that he would change his ways. “You are definitely not going to see me again,” he said.

Murray was given a three-year suspended prison sentence, with a probation requirement. He was given a five-year restraining order.

At the original rioting sentence hearing in August 2024, the court was told that Murray was part of “mob-handed violence” and looting that broke out in Hull city centre. He was “persistently” in various locations during the trouble.

He was prominent at the front of a group in Jameson Street, running at police with a long metal bench, which he threw towards the line of police.

He behaved aggressively to police throughout and he was present when a garage was targeted in the Milky Way area.

Those at the garage, including children, barricaded themselves inside and were in fear for their safety. Murray had, that day, admitted violent disorder, two offences of burglary at the O2 and Greggs shops, and another offence of possessing cannabis. He had been given a five-year criminal behaviour order.

Hull Daily Mail

A father has been jailed after throwing an empty beer can at police officers during disorder in Southampton.

Kamil Klonek, 38, of Lordswood Road, Southampton, was among a crowd involved in violent disorder in Belmont Road on Tuesday, June 2.

Southampton Crown Court heard how footage showed Klonek at the front of a line of protesters, drinking from a can of beer and gesturing towards Hampshire Constabulary officers.

The disorder came during protests following the murder of 18-year-old University of Southampton student Henry Nowak, with demonstrators gathering over the killing and allegations of two-tier policing.

The court heard Klonek was seen shouting abuse at officers, calling them “traitors”, while encouraging others to get involved in the disorder.

Police drone footage showed Klonek wearing sunglasses, a cap and a grey hoodie. The court heard he made several attempts to conceal his identity by pulling his top over his face.

Prosecutor Matthew Lawson said: “In the footage the defendant can be seen waving his arms in a confrontational manner with clenched fists.

“When police arrested the defendant at his home on June 6 he said he was there but did not throw anything.”

Klonek initially denied the charge of violent disorder, with a trial scheduled for November 30. However, the court heard his defence indicated on October 14 that he had changed his plea.

Defending, Callum Bisson-Simmonds said: “The throw of the can was an underarm toss that landed around six to nine feet away from the police line on Belmont Road.

“The defendant is acting in a way that can be described a drunken buffoonery.

“My client accepts that and is deeply sorry for the way that he acted.

“He disgraced himself by way of his actions and is deeply ashamed.

“Mr Klonek has a child that is soon to reach their first birthday – if he remains in custody he will miss that.

“He came to the UK 15 years ago from Poland.”

Klonek was sentenced to two years and six months behind bars.

Addressing the defendant, Judge William Mosley KC said: “You were near the front of the crowd, you applauded, threw a can and shouted abuse at officer while encouraging others to do the same.”

When he is released from jail, Klonek will be required to wear an electronic tag while on licence.

Daily Echo

Judge says actor and comedian faces ‘significant custodial term’ after being convicted of raping a woman and assaulting three others

Russell Brand has been found guilty of raping a woman and sexually assaulting three others over the course of five years of his showbusiness career.

Brand, 51, was described during his trial as a ruthless, calculated and manipulative sexual predator. He was accused of raping women in a hotel room, in a bar toilet and at his luxury London townhouse. He sexually assaulted women in front of his entourage at their workplaces, including at a radio station and TV studio.

The Hollywood actor turned online influencer was accused of gaslighting his victims after the attacks, and treating women as a “disposable commodity” and a “means to an end” to satisfy his voracious sexual appetite.

Brand stood outside the door of the dock shortly before the jury delivered their verdicts and looked at his wife, Laura, saying: “Laura, I love you.”

Wearing a grey three-piece suit, he appeared to be praying in the dock before he was convicted of four offences on Thursday after a four-week trial at Southwark crown court.

He had pleaded not guilty to three charges of rape, three of sexual assault and one of attempted indecent assault against six women, in allegations spanning 10 years from 1999.

Brand claimed he could not remember some of the incidents and that others had been consensual sexual encounters that had been “reimagined” or “unfavourably reframed” after the publication of sexual misconduct allegations against him in a 2023 Channel 4 Dispatches documentary, and Times and Sunday Times reports.

But Brand closed his eyes, as a jury found him guilty of four offences after eight hours and thirty minutes of deliberations.

The judge, Mr Justice Bennathan, praised the panel of four women and eight men, and told Brand: “You’ve been convicted of a numbers of offences, including one of rape. The consequence of that is inevitably a significant custodial term. My current view is that I have to therefore remand you in custody.”

He said Brand would be sentenced on Monday.

Brand held his head high and appeared emotionless as he was led away by the dock officers down to the cells.

Brand’s trial heard victims had been haunted by their encounters with the former presenter and that they had “bravely” come forward to the tell “the truth” after realising they were not alone.

The prosecutor, Riel Karmy-Jones KC, said they described a similar pattern of behaviour from the comedian that started with compliments, flattery and flirting before a “personality change”. “His eyes changed, he snapped, from charming to frightening to nasty,” she said.

But Brand’s barrister, Ian Winter KC, denied the TV personality was a “psychopath who rapes people and thinks it’s normal”. He claimed Brand was respectful when women said no and that being “rude or acting like a crazy idiot” during sex is not a crime if there is consent.

In his closing speech on Monday, the barrister also questioned why Brand’s accusers had not screamed, kicked out or slapped Brand when they were raped. “Not one of them resisted or screamed or even tried to leave,” he said.

Det Supt Andy Furphy, from the Met police, praised the “extraordinary courage, resilience and determination” of Brand’s victims. In a statement, he said: “Despite intense media and public scrutiny, they relived deeply personal and traumatic experiences and placed their trust in us. Without their bravery, this outcome would not have been possible.

“Brand used his influence, status and fame to prey on and exploit women. As his profile grew, so too did his sense of entitlement. I hope this conviction sends a clear message that no one is above the law, no matter how famous or powerful they may be.”

He also paid tribute to the “professionalism and determination” of the team of detectives and specialist staff who worked on the high-profile investigation, which attracted widespread international coverage.

“Finally, I would urge anyone who may have been a victim of rape or serious sexual assault to speak to us. You will be listened to, supported and treated with dignity and respect,” he said.

The Guardian